Glen or Faber Chimney | Which One Should You Buy

When people ask me, Glen or Faber Chimney, which is better, I don’t give them a one-line answer. I give them the same answer I’m about to give you here, based on five years of actually cooking under both of these hoods in two different homes.

I bought the Glen Hood Aqua SS Kitchen Chimney 60cm first, back when I moved into a rented flat in Bangalore. Two years later, when I shifted to my own place, I installed the Faber Pluto 60 cm 1000 m³/hr Wall Mounted Kitchen Chimney in the new kitchen. So this isn’t a comparison built from spec sheets and press releases. It’s built from actual dal tadka, deep frying, and the occasional smoky tawa session that tested both machines hard.

If you’re stuck choosing between a Glen vs Faber kitchen chimney, or searching for a straight answer to Glen or Faber which is better, this article should settle most of your doubts. Think of this as a full Glen vs Faber chimney comparison and honest Faber vs Glen chimney review rolled into one, written specifically with a Glen or Faber chimney for Indian kitchen setup in mind.

Those Who Are In a Hurry!

Prices on Amazon keep changing.

Glen or Faber Chimney: Which One Did I Buy First and Why

I picked the Glen Hood Aqua because it was priced lower and my landlord wanted something simple to install without much fuss. It’s a pyramid-style, stainless steel chimney with a baffle filter and push-button controls. Suction is rated at around 750 m³/hr, which was fine for a small rental kitchen where I mostly did light frying and everyday cooking.

The Faber Pluto came later, once I had a bigger kitchen and did more frequent heavy cooking, including regular deep frying and tandoor-style dishes on weekends. It’s rated at 1000 m³/hr, also with a baffle filter, push-button controls, and LED lighting. Faber backs it with a 1-year full warranty on the unit and 12 years on the motor.

Both brands are well known in Indian kitchens, so this Glen vs Faber chimney review isn’t about one being a “bad brand.” It’s about which one suits your kitchen size, cooking style, and budget.

First Impressions: Design and Build Quality

The Glen Hood Aqua has a classic pyramid shape in brushed stainless steel. It looked neat on day one and matched a simple, no-frills kitchen well. The body felt sturdy, though the finish showed fingerprint marks quickly, which meant more wiping than I expected.

The Faber Pluto has a plainer, boxier wall-mounted design in matte black. It’s less flashy than some curved-glass Faber models, but the matte finish actually hides smudges better than the Glen’s steel body. If your kitchen has a more modern, minimalist look, the Pluto blends in nicely.

Neither chimney felt cheap out of the box. Both had solid screws, decent packaging, and no rattling parts on installation day.

Daily Cooking Experience: Glen vs Faber Kitchen Chimney

This is where five years of daily use actually tell you something a spec sheet cannot.

Heavy Indian Cooking and Frying Performance

In the rented kitchen, the Glen Hood Aqua handled regular tempering, sautéing, and light frying without any trouble. Where it struggled a bit was during heavier sessions, like frying pakoras for guests or making a big batch of puris. The smoke would linger a little longer near the ceiling before getting pulled out.

The Faber Pluto, with its higher suction rating, handled heavier frying sessions more comfortably. Deep frying pooris, roasting papads directly on the flame, and tempering with mustard seeds and curry leaves all got cleared out faster. If your household does a lot of heavy Indian cooking with regular frying, the extra suction genuinely makes a difference.

Oil and Smoke Removal

Both chimneys use baffle filters, which are generally considered better suited for Indian cooking compared to mesh filters, since they handle oily, heavy smoke without clogging as fast. You can read more on this in our detailed piece on Baffle Filter vs Filterless Chimney if you’re still deciding between filter types.

In my experience, Faber’s baffle filter caught oil slightly more efficiently during heavy frying, likely because of the stronger airflow pulling smoke through the filter faster. The Glen’s filter did the job fine for regular cooking, but during oil-heavy sessions, I noticed more residue building up on the outer body over time.

Suction Power Comparison: Glen vs Faber Chimney Suction Power

On paper, this comparison is straightforward:

• Glen Hood Aqua SS: around 750 m³/hr
• Faber Pluto: 1000 m³/hr

In real use, that 250 m³/hr difference is noticeable, but only if your kitchen is on the larger side or you cook heavy meals often. For a small kitchen with light to moderate cooking, Glen’s 750 m³/hr was genuinely sufficient in my rented flat. Once I moved to a bigger, more open kitchen layout, the Faber’s stronger suction handled the extra volume of air much better.

If you’re doing a Glen vs Faber chimney suction power comparison specifically for a kitchen larger than 150 to 200 square feet, or if you fry often, the Faber Pluto has a real advantage. For a compact kitchen with lighter cooking habits, the Glen Hood Aqua’s suction is adequate.

Auto Clean and Filter Type: Glen vs Faber Auto Clean Chimney

Neither the Glen Hood Aqua nor the Faber Pluto I used comes with auto-clean technology. Both rely on manual filter cleaning, which is worth knowing upfront if you were expecting a hands-off maintenance experience.

If auto-clean or a Glen vs Faber filterless chimney setup matters to you, both brands do offer higher-end models with filterless, auto-clean technology, just not in the Aqua or Pluto lines I’ve used. Our guide on choosing an electric kitchen chimney breaks down when filterless auto-clean models are worth the extra cost, and when a simple baffle filter model like these two is perfectly fine.

For my own household, I actually preferred the baffle filter models. They’re cheaper to maintain long term, and cleaning them every few weeks became a routine I didn’t mind. If you’re running a proper Glen vs Faber auto clean chimney comparison or a Glen vs Faber filterless chimney comparison before buying, both brands’ higher-end lines are worth checking separately from the Aqua and Pluto models covered here.

Noise Level After Years of Use

Out of the box, both chimneys were reasonably quiet on the lowest speed and noticeably louder on the highest speed, which is normal for this suction range.

After five years, the Glen Hood Aqua developed a soft rattling sound at high speed, which I traced back to a loose screw near the motor housing. Once tightened, it quieted down again.

The Faber Pluto, being newer in my ownership timeline, hasn’t shown the same wear yet, but it did run slightly louder than the Glen even from day one, likely because of the stronger motor pulling more air. If noise is a big concern for your household, keep in mind that higher suction generally means a bit more sound at top speed.

Installation Experience

Installation for the Glen Hood Aqua was handled by a local technician, not Glen’s own service team, since I bought it through a retailer bundle deal. It took about two hours, and the ducting was done reasonably well, though the technician didn’t explain much about maintenance.

The Faber Pluto installation was done by Faber’s own service partner. It was more organized. The technician arrived on schedule, explained filter cleaning, checked the ducting angle carefully, and even gave tips on the ideal height above the stove. This is one area where Faber’s structured service network showed a real advantage over a smaller, less standardized Glen installation experience.

Cleaning and Maintenance: Ease of Cleaning

Both chimneys need filter cleaning roughly every three to four weeks if you cook daily with regular frying, or every six to eight weeks for lighter cooking.

The Glen’s filter panels came out easily, but the frame around them collected grease that was a bit tricky to reach with a cloth. The Faber’s filter housing was slightly more accessible, and the flat matte black body meant grease stains were less visible between cleanings, even if they were technically still there.

Neither chimney requires professional cleaning if you stay consistent. I typically soak the filters in warm water with dish soap for twenty minutes, scrub gently, and let them air dry before refitting.

Service Experience: Glen vs Faber Chimney Service Comparison

This is genuinely one of the biggest differentiators between the two brands, at least based on what I experienced and what friends and family have shared with me over the years.

Faber has a wider, more established service network across most Indian cities, with faster response times for warranty claims and easier access to spare parts. When my Faber’s motor made a slight humming noise in year three, a technician visited within two days and resolved it under warranty at no cost.

Glen’s service, while not bad, felt less consistent. My one service request for a wiring issue took about five days to get resolved, and I had to follow up twice. Spare parts availability for older Glen models can also be patchier depending on your city.

If after-sales service is a priority for you, and it should be, Faber currently has an edge based on both my personal experience and general market reputation.

Warranty Comparison: Glen vs Faber Chimney Warranty

The Faber Pluto comes with a 1-year full warranty on the unit and a 12-year warranty specifically on the motor, which is a strong offering for this price range.

The Glen Hood Aqua I purchased came with a standard 1-year warranty, with some Glen models offering a lifetime warranty on the filter itself, though this varies by exact model and retailer, so it’s worth double-checking the listing before you buy.

For long-term peace of mind, especially around the motor, which is the most expensive part to replace, Faber’s warranty terms are more reassuring on paper and matched what I experienced when I needed support.

Price Comparison: Glen vs Faber Chimney Price Comparison

Pricing on both brands varies by retailer, festive discounts, and model variant, so I’d recommend checking current listings before buying. Generally speaking, the Glen Hood Aqua sits in a more budget-friendly range, while the Faber Pluto, with its higher suction and stronger motor warranty, tends to sit slightly higher, though it’s still considered an affordable option within Faber’s own lineup.

If you’re working with a tighter budget and have a smaller kitchen, the Glen Hood Aqua gives you solid value. If you can stretch your budget a little for stronger suction and better after-sales backing, the Faber Pluto is worth the difference.

Glen or Faber Chimney: Full Comparison Table

Feature	Glen Hood Aqua SS 60cm	Faber Pluto 60cm 1000 m³/hr
Design	Pyramid, stainless steel	Wall-mounted, matte black
Finish	Brushed steel shows fingerprints	Matte black hides smudges
Build Quality	Sturdy, solid on installation	Sturdy, slightly heavier feel
Suction Power	Around 750 m³/hr	1000 m³/hr
Filter Type	Baffle filter	Baffle filter
Auto Clean	Not available on this model	Not available on this model
Noise Level	Moderate, mild rattling after years	Slightly louder at top speed
Controls	Push button	Push button
Lighting	LED	LED
Installation	Average, less guidance given	Well-organized, detailed guidance
Ease of Cleaning	Good, grease collects near the frame	Good, more accessible housing
Warranty	1-year standard	1 year full plus 12 years motor
Customer Service	Average response time	Faster, more consistent
Spare Parts	Can be patchy by city	Generally easier to find
Best For	Small kitchens, light cooking	Medium to large kitchens, heavy frying
Price	Budget friendly	Slightly higher, good value
Overall Value	Good for tight budgets	Good for long-term reliability

Things I Liked and Disliked About Each

Glen Hood Aqua: Pros and Cons

What I liked:

• Affordable price point for a stainless steel chimney
• Simple pyramid design that suits small kitchens
• Adequate suction for everyday, light cooking

What I disliked:

• Suction struggles a bit during heavy frying sessions
• The steel body shows fingerprints and needs frequent wiping
• Service response felt slower when I needed a repair

Faber Pluto: Pros and Cons

What I liked:

• Stronger suction handles heavy Indian cooking well
• Matte black finish hides smudges better day to day
• Faster, more organized service and installation experience
• 12-year motor warranty gives long-term confidence

What I disliked:

• Slightly noisier at top speed compared to the Glen
• A touch pricier than entry-level Glen models
• No auto-clean feature on this particular model

Which One Would I Buy Again

If I were furnishing a small rental kitchen on a tight budget again, I would happily buy the Glen Hood Aqua again. It did its job without complaints for two years.

For my current home, where cooking is heavier and more frequent, I would choose the Faber Pluto again without hesitation. The stronger suction, better service network, and longer motor warranty make it the more dependable long-term choice for a busy Indian kitchen.

Best Chimney Glen or Faber: A Few Buying Tips

Before you decide on the Best chimney Glen or Faber, for your own kitchen, keep these points in mind.

• Measure your kitchen size first. Anything above 150 to 200 square feet with regular frying benefits from 1000 m³/hr or higher suction.
• Check if you prefer a baffle filter or a filterless auto-clean model. Our guide on Baffle Filter vs Filterless Chimney covers this in detail.
• Look up the service center locations near you before buying, not after.
• Compare the motor warranty length carefully, since motor replacement is the costliest repair.
• If you’re still unsure which brand fits your needs overall, our article on Which Vhimney Brand is Best in India is a good starting point.
• Read up on the general Use of a Kitchen Chimney in Your Home if this is your first time buying one.

When checking energy ratings or safety certifications, it also helps to glance at guidance from the Bureau of Indian Standards and the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, so you know what to look for on the product label before purchase.

Ready to Make Your Choice?

Compare today’s prices before making your decision.

For Glen Hood Aqua SS 60cm:

Prices on Amazon keep changing.

For Faber Pluto 60cm 1000 m³/hr:

Prices on Amazon keep changing.

Reviews on Amazon of the Glen Hood Aqua SS 60cm

Reviews on Amazon of the Faber Pluto 60cm 1000 m³/hr

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Glen or Faber Chimney Which is better in India?

It depends on your kitchen size and cooking style. For light cooking in a small kitchen, Glen is a solid budget pick. For heavier, more frequent cooking, Faber’s stronger suction and service network make it the better long-term choice.

2. Glen vs Faber Chimney Which has better suction power?

The Faber Pluto, at 1000 m³/hr, has stronger suction than the Glen Hood Aqua’s roughly 750 m³/hr rating, making it better suited for larger kitchens and heavier frying.

3. Is Glen Chimney Better than Faber for small kitchens?

For a small, compact kitchen with light cooking habits, the Glen Hood Aqua performs well and costs less, so it can be the better fit for that specific use case.

4. Glen vs Faber Auto Clean Chimney, Which one should I choose?

Neither the Glen Hood Aqua nor the Faber Pluto covered here has auto-clean. If auto-clean matters to you, check the higher-end auto-clean and filterless models from both brands separately.

5. Glen vs Faber Filterless Chimney, is filterless worth it?

Filterless chimneys reduce manual cleaning but usually cost more upfront and can be pricier to service. Baffle filter models like these two are more budget-friendly and easier to maintain at home.

6. Which Chimney is better Glen or Faber for heavy cooking?

For heavy, frequent Indian cooking with regular deep frying, Faber’s Pluto, with its 1000 m³/hr suction, handles the load more comfortably than the Glen Hood Aqua.

7. Glen vs Faber Chimney Warranty, Which brand offers better coverage?

Faber’s Pluto comes with a 1-year full warranty plus 12 years on the motor. Glen’s Hood Aqua typically comes with a standard 1-year warranty, so Faber has an edge on long-term motor coverage.

8. Glen vs Faber Chimney Price Comparison, Which is cheaper?

The Glen Hood Aqua is generally priced lower, making it a good budget option, while the Faber Pluto sits slightly higher but offers stronger performance and service support for the extra cost.

9. Glen vs Faber Chimney Service Comparison, Which brand has better after-sales support?

Based on my own experience, Faber’s service network responded faster and more consistently than Glen’s, both during installation and for a later repair.

10. Best Kitchen Chimney Glen or Faber for home use?

For everyday home use in an average Indian kitchen with moderate to heavy cooking, the Faber Pluto is my overall recommendation, though the Glen Hood Aqua remains a solid, budget-friendly choice for smaller households.

Final Verdict: Glen or Faber Chimney

After five years of using both, here’s how I’d sum it up.

• Best value for tight budgets: Glen Hood Aqua SS
• Best for heavy Indian cooking: Faber Pluto
• Best for modern kitchen looks: Faber Pluto, thanks to its matte black finish
• Best for budget buyers with small kitchens: Glen Hood Aqua SS
• Overall winner: Faber Pluto, mainly because of its stronger suction, better warranty on the motor, and more reliable service experience

Both brands make dependable chimneys, and you won’t go wrong picking either one for the right kitchen. If you cook often, cook heavily, and want fewer service headaches down the line, go with Faber. If your kitchen is compact and your cooking is on the lighter side, Glen still gets the job done without breaking your budget.